Circadian gene expression patterns on the periphery depend on the genotype
published: July 21, 2014, recorded: May 2014, views: 1520
Slides
Related content
Report a problem or upload files
If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Description
Questions
Biological clock is an important component in body homeostasis. However, it is not clear how the
genetic background of each individual influences circadian expression and regulation. We addressed
this question by investigating gene expression in liver and adrenal glands of inbreed mouse strains
129/SvPas plus C57BL/6J and pure C57BL/6J, in dark-dark (DD) or light-dark (LD) conditions.
Methods
Mice were sampled in 2-4h intervals over 24h with at least 5 mice per time point. The 24 h gene
expression profiles were fitted using various trigonometric functions to obtain the circadian amplitudes
and phases. Genome variation data files were downloaded from dbSNP database for the three 129
mouse strains and compared to the reference strain C57BL/6J.
Results
Robustness of the circadian expression depends on the genotype and tissue. In adrenal glands under
LD many genes differ in circadian profiles between mouse strains. Steroidogenic genes (Cyp11a1,
Cyp17a1, Cyp21a1, Cyp51) are phase-shifted between strains at least in one of the lightening
conditions. The majority of steroidogenic and core clock genes are expressed at higher levels with
higher amplitudes in 129/SvPas mixed strain, exceptions are Arntl and Cry1. Liver seems to maintain
a more robust circadian regulation compared to adrenal glands with fewer differences observed. Since
the genomes of 129 and C57BL/6J mice are already sequenced we questioned whether the modified
circadian expression derives from mutations in these genes or their regulatory regions. We identified
16.900 sequence variations in 193 selected genes. The majority of variations (> 97%) were discovered
in intron and promoter regions. The three 129 strains had the same variations in coding regions of
Per3, Vipr2, Opnn4 and Dusp4. Nucleotide variations in were observed also in intron and promoter
regions of Per2, RevERBa, Dec2 and Bmal1 that showed differences in phase or amplitudes.
Conclusions
Light has greater impact on circadian expression of core clock and metabolic genes in the 129/SvPas
background. Together with the genotype, the light influences primarily the amplitudes of core clock
genes while the amplitudes and phases are affected in metabolic genes. 86% of analyzed genes in
three different 129 strains harbor genetic variations compared to the reference strain C57BL/6J. The
majority of these are in intron and promoter regions that could affect gene expression and thus also
the circadian changes observed in our experiment. These findings might have important implications
for understanding the genetic bases of the circadian rhythm differences in human individuals and their
susceptibility to develop the clock-based diseases.
Link this page
Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !
Write your own review or comment: